Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Callicosta affinis | (Hook.) Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta andersonii | (Crosby) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta armata | (Broth.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta asperifolia | (Mitt.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta bipinnata | (Schwägr.) Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta composita | (Hedw.) Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta corrugata | (Renauld & Cardot) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta cristata | (Mitt.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta debilis | (Besch.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta divaricata | (Mitt.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta evanescens | Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta fendleri | (Müll.Hal.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta husnotii | (Schimp. ex Besch.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta hypnoides | (Hedw.) Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta longicaulis | (Broth.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta lophophylla | (Sull.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta luciae | (Crosby) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta procera | (Mitt.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta ramosissima | (Mitt.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Callicosta rugifolia | (Müll.Hal.) Crosby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.