Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caladium bicolor | (Aiton) Vent. | 135 | documented |
| Caladium schomburgkii | Schott | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium amazonicum | E.G.Gonç. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium andreanum | Bogner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium clavatum | Hett., Bogner & J.Boos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium coerulescens | G.S.Bunting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium cortesiae | Croat & E.G.Gonç. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium humboldtii | (Raf.) Schott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium intermedium | E.G.Gonç. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium macrotites | Schott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium palaciosii | Croat & L.P.Hannon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium picturatum | K.Koch & C.D.Bouché | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium praetermissum | Bogner & Hett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium smaragdinum | K.Koch & C.D.Bouché | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium steudneriaefolium | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium stevensonii | Croat & Delannay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium steyermarkii | G.S.Bunting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium ternatum | Madison | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Caladium tuberosum | (S.Moore) Bogner & Mayo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.