Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bruchia aurea | Besch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia bolanderi | Lesq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia brevifolia | Sull. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia brevipes | Harv. ex Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia carinata | (Hampe) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia carolinae | Austin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia drummondii | Hampe ex E.Britton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia eckloniana | Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia flexuosa | (Schwägr.) Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia fusca | E.Britton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia hallii | Austin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia hampeana | Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia microspora | Nog. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia paricutinensis | Delgad. & M.Á.Cárdenas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia queenslandica | I.G.Stone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia ravenelii | Wilson ex Sull. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia sinensis | P.C.Chen ex T.Cao & C.Gao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia texana | Austin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia uruguensis | Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bruchia vogesiaca | Nestl. ex Schwägr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.