Bredemeyera

Accepted species 21 Documented here 0 Family Polygalaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Bredemeyera atlantica M.Mota & J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera barbeyana Chodat 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera bracteata Klotzsch 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera bracteata Klotzsch ex Hassk. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera brevifolia (Benth.) Klotzsch ex A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera confusa Chodat 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera cuneata Klotzsch ex Hassk. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera densiflora A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera disperma (Vell.) J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera divaricata (DC.) J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera floribunda Willd. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera hebeclada (DC.) J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera isabelliana Barb.Rodr. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera laurifolia (A.St.-Hil. & Moq.) Klotzsch ex A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera lucida Klotzsch ex Hassk. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera martiana A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera microphylla Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera moritziana Klotzsch ex Hassk. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera myrtifolia A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera petiolata M.Mota & J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Bredemeyera revoluta A.W.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.