Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boeica arunachalensis | D.Borah, R.Kr.Singh, Taram & A.P.Das | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica brachyandra | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica clarkei | Hareesh, L.Wu, A.Joe & M.Sabu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica enpingensis | (F.Wen, Y.G.Wei & Z.B.Xin) A.Weber & Mich.Möller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica ferruginea | Drake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica filiformis | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica fulva | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica glandulosa | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica griffithii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica hirsuta | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica konchurangensis | B.H.Quang, D.V.Hai & Mich.Möller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica multinervia | K.Y.Pan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica nutans | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica ornithocephalantha | F.Wen, T.V.Do & Y.G.Wei | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica porosa | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica stolonifera | K.Y.Pan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Boeica yunnanensis | (H.W.Li) K.Y.Pan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.