Blotiella

Accepted species 20 Documented here 2 Family Dennstaedtiaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Blotiella pubescens (Kaulf.) R.M.Tryon 4 documented
Blotiella natalensis (Hook.) R.M.Tryon 3 documented
Blotiella aurita (L.) Boudrie, Cremers & Viane 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella bouxiniana Pic.Serm. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella confusa Jongkind & W.de Winter 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella coriacea Verdc. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella coursii (Tardieu) Rakotondr. ex J.P.Roux 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella crenata (Alston) Schelpe 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella currorii (Hook.) R.M.Tryon 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella glabra (Bory) R.M.Tryon 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella hieronymi (Kümmerle) Pic.Serm. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella isaloensis (Tardieu) J.P.Roux 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella lanceifolia (J.Agardh) Rakotondr. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella madagascariensis (Hook.) R.M.Tryon 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella marojejyensis J.P.Roux 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella reducta (C.Chr.) R.M.Tryon 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella sinuata (Alston) Pic.Serm. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella stipitata (Alston) Faden 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella tisserantii (Alston & Tardieu ex Tardieu) Pic.Serm. 0 below the evidence gate
Blotiella trichosora Pic.Serm. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.