Billolivia

Accepted species 18 Documented here 0 Family Gesneriaceae

Accepted species 18 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Billolivia antoanensis Luu, Luc Nguyen & T.Q.T.Nguyen 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia cadamensis Q.D.Nguyen, N.L.Vu & Luu 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia citrina Luu, H.Ð.Trần & N.L.Vu 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia kyi Luu & G.Tran 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia lamdongensis Hareesh, T.A.Le & D.D.Nguyen 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia longipetiolata D.J.Middleton & Luu 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia maiana Luu, N.L.Vu, H.Ð.Trần & H.C.Nguyen 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia middletonii N.S.Lý 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia minutiflora D.J.Middleton & H.J.Atkins 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia moelleri D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia noanii Luu, N.L.Vu & H.N.Pham 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia poilanei D.J.Middleton & H.J.Atkins 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia thongii Hareesh, T.A.Le & T.T.D.Pham 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia tichii Luu, Q.D.Nguyen & N.L.Vu 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia truciae Luu & Q.D.Nguyen 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia vietnamensis D.J.Middleton & Luu 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia violacea D.J.Middleton & H.J.Atkins 0 below the evidence gate
Billolivia yenhoae Luu 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.