Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biarum dispar | (Schott) Talavera | 31 | documented |
| Biarum davisii | Turrill | 4 | documented |
| Biarum tenuifolium | (L.) Schott | 3 | documented |
| Biarum × cinarense | C.Çeçen, Akan, Yıldırım & Balos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum aleppicum | J.Thiébaut | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum angustatum | (Hook.f.) N.E.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum auraniticum | Mouterde | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum bovei | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum carduchorum | (Schott) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum carratracense | (Willk.) Font Quer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum crispulum | (Schott) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum ditschianum | Bogner & P.C.Boyce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum eximium | (Schott & Kotschy) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum fraasianum | (Schott) Nyman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum kotschyi | (Schott) B.Mathew ex Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum marmarisense | (P.C.Boyce) P.C.Boyce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum mendax | P.C.Boyce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum olivieri | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum pyrami | (Schott) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum rhopalospadix | K.Koch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum rifatii | Yıldırım & Altioglu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum straussii | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Biarum syriacum | (Spreng.) Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.