Berlinia

Accepted species 21 Documented here 0 Family Fabaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Berlinia auriculata Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia bracteosa Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia bruneelii (De Wild.) Torre & Hillc. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia confusa Hoyle 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia congolensis (Baker f.) Keay 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia coriacea Keay 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia craibiana Baker f. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia delevoyi De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia giorgii De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia grandiflora (Vahl) Hutch. & Dalziel 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia hollandii Hutch. & Dalziel 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia immaculata Mackinder & Wieringa 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia korupensis Mackinder & Burgt 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia occidentalis Keay 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia orientalis Brenan 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia phenacoa Mackinder 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia rabiensis Mackinder 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia razzifera Mackinder & Wieringa 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia sapinii De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia tomentella Keay 0 below the evidence gate
Berlinia viridicans Baker f. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.