Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benkara malabarica | (Lam.) Tirveng. | 13 | documented |
| Benkara sinensis | (Lour.) Ridsdale | 10 | documented |
| Benkara armigera | (K.Schum.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara depauperata | (Drake) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara emanuelssoniana | (Ridsdale) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara esculenta | (Lour.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara evenosa | (Hutch.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara fasciculata | (Roxb.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara forrestii | (J.Anthony) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara griffithii | (Hook.f.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara hainanensis | (Merr.) C.M.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara hoaensis | (Pierre ex Pit.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara microcarpa | (Bartl. ex DC.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara miquelii | (Koord. & Valeton) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara ovoidea | (Pierre ex Pit.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara parviflora | (King & Gamble) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara pierrei | (Pit.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara rectispina | (Merr.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Benkara scandens | (Thunb.) Ridsdale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.