Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bastardiastrum gracile | (Hochr.) D.M.Bates | 5 | documented |
| Bastardiastrum batesii | Fryxell & S.D.Koch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum cinctum | (Brandegee) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum hirsutiflorum | (C.Presl) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum incanum | (Brandegee) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum tarasoides | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum tricarpellatum | (B.L.Rob. & Greenm.) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bastardiastrum wissaduloides | (Baker f.) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.