Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bassia scoparia | (L.) A.J.Scott | 585 | documented |
| Bassia prostrata | (L.) Beck | 90 | documented |
| Bassia hyssopifolia | (Pall.) Kuntze | 57 | documented |
| Bassia laniflora | (S.G.Gmel.) A.J.Scott | 17 | documented |
| Bassia arabica | (Boiss.) Maire & Weiller | 3 | documented |
| Bassia eriophora | (Schrad.) Asch. | 3 | documented |
| Bassia muricata | (L.) Asch. | 3 | documented |
| Bassia tomentosa | (Lowe) Maire & Weiller | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia aegyptiaca | Turki, El Shayeb & F.Shehata | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia americana | (S.Watson) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia angustifolia | (Turcz.) Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia dinteri | (Botsch.) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia indica | (Wight) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia lasiantha | Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia littorea | (Makino) Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia melanoptera | (Bunge) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia odontoptera | (Schrenk) Freitag & G. Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia pilosa | (Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia salsoloides | (Fenzl) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia stellaris | (Moq.) Bornm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia tianschanica | (Pavlov) Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bassia villosissima | (Bong. & C.A.Mey.) Freitag & G.Kadereit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.