Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnadesia arborea | Kunth | 37 | documented |
| Barnadesia spinosa | L.f. | 17 | documented |
| Barnadesia odorata | Griseb. | 11 | documented |
| Barnadesia aculeata | (Benth.) I.C.Chung | 4 | documented |
| Barnadesia horrida | Muschl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia polyacantha | Wedd. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia blakeana | Ferreyra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia caryophylla | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia ciliata | (I.C.Chung) Harling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia corymbosa | D.Don | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia dombeyana | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia glomerata | Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia jelskii | Hieron. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia lehmannii | Hieron. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia macbridei | Ferreyra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia macrocephala | Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia parviflora | Spruce ex Benth. & Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia pycnophylla | Muschl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia reticulata | D.Don | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barnadesia woodii | D.J.N.Hind | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.