Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barkeria vanneriana | Rchb.f. | 6 | documented |
| Barkeria skinneri | (Bateman ex Lindl.) A.Rich. & Galeotti | 4 | documented |
| Barkeria skinneri | (Bateman ex Lindl.) Paxton | 4 | documented |
| Barkeria barkeriola | Rchb.f. | 3 | documented |
| Barkeria palmeri | (Rolfe) Schltr. | 3 | documented |
| Barkeria uniflora | (Lex.) Dressler & Halb. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria obovata | (C.Presl) Christenson | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria spectabilis | Bateman ex Lindl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria archilarum | Chiron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria dorotheae | Halb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria fritz-halbingeriana | Soto Arenas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria lindleyana | Bateman ex Lindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria melanocaulon | A.Rich. & Galeotti | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria naevosa | (Lindl.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria scandens | (Lex.) Dressler & Halb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria shoemakeri | Halb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria strophinx | (Rchb.f.) Halb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria uruapani | León-Peralta, Valdez-Partida & Pérez-García | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Barkeria whartoniana | (C.Schweinf.) Soto Arenas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.