Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bakeridesia pittieri | (Donn.Sm.) D.M.Bates | 6 | documented |
| Bakeridesia gloriosa | D.M.Bates | 5 | documented |
| Bakeridesia gaumeri | (Standl.) D.M.Bates | 3 | documented |
| Bakeridesia yucatana | (Standl.) D.M.Bates | 3 | documented |
| Bakeridesia amoena | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia bakeriana | (Rose) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia chittendenii | (Standl.) Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia esculenta | (A.St.-Hil.) Monteiro | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia exalata | D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia ferruginea | (Martyn) Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia guerrerensis | Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia huastecana | Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia integerrima | (Hook.) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia jaliscana | Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia molinae | D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia nelsonii | (Rose) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia notolophium | (A.Gray) Hochr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia parvifolia | Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia vulcanicola | (Standl.) D.M.Bates | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Bakeridesia zapoteca | Donnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.