Baissea

Accepted species 24 Documented here 0 Family Apocynaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Baissea wulfhorstii Schinz 1 below the evidence gate
Baissea atrobrunnea O.Lachenaud 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea axillaris (Benth.) Hua 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea baillonii Hua 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea campanulata (K.Schum.) de Kruif 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea congensis (R.D.Good) Jongkind 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea erythrosticha K.Schum. 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea floribunda Hua 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea gracillima (K.Schum.) Hua 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea klaineana Pierre 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea lane-poolei Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea leonensis Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea leontonori Dilst 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea longipetiolata Dilst 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea major (Stapf) Hiern 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea malchairii K.Schum. 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea multiflora A.DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea myrtifolia (Benth.) Pichon 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea ochrantha K.Schum. ex Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea subrufa Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea tholonnii Hua 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea viridiflora (K.Schum.) de Kruif 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea welwitschii (Baill.) Stapf ex Hiern 0 below the evidence gate
Baissea zygodioides (K.Schum.) Stapf 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.