Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baeckea imbricata | (Gaertn.) Druce | 73 | documented |
| Baeckea frutescens | L. | 62 | documented |
| Baeckea gunniana | S.Schauer ex Walp. | 53 | documented |
| Baeckea linifolia | Rudge | 42 | documented |
| Baeckea diosmifolia | Rudge | 27 | documented |
| Baeckea brevifolia | (Rudge) DC. | 12 | documented |
| Baeckea leptocaulis | Hook.f. | 5 | documented |
| Baeckea drummondii | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea elderiana | Pritz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea kandos | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea latifolia | (Benth.) A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea leptophylla | (Turcz.) Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea muricata | C.A.Gardner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea omissa | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea pentagonantha | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea robusta | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea spinosa | Sieber ex Spreng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea staminosa | Pritz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea subcuneata | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea trapeza | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Baeckea utilis | F.Muell. ex Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.