Austrobuxus

Accepted species 22 Documented here 1 Family Picrodendraceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Austrobuxus swainii (Beuzev. & C.T.White) Airy Shaw 37 documented
Austrobuxus alticola McPherson 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus brevipes Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus carunculatus (Baill.) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus celebicus Welzen & P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus clusiaceus (Baill.) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus cracens McPherson 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus cuneatus (Airy Shaw) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus dentatus Welzen & P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus ellipticus McPherson 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus eugeniifolius (Guillaumin) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus horneanus (A.C.Sm.) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus huerlimannii Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus mandjelicus McPherson 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus megacarpus P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus montis-do Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus nitidus Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus ovalis Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus pauciflorus Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus petiolaris Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus rubiginosus (Guillaumin) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate
Austrobuxus vieillardii (Guillaumin) Airy Shaw 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.