Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atrichopsis angulata | (Cardot & Broth.) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis australis | (Hook.f. & Wilson) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis bellii | (Broth.) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis capensis | Schelpe & N.C.Fanshawe ex van Rooy, N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis compressa | (Hook.f. & Wilson) G.L.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis crispula | (Hook.f. & Wilson) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis erosa | (Hampe) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis laxifolia | (Dixon) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis mexicana | (G.L.Sm.) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis minima | (Cardot) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis tapes | (Müll.Hal.) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis tenuirostris | (Hook.) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis tetragona | Schelpe & N.C.Fanshawe ex van Rooy, N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis trichodon | (Hook.f. & Wilson) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis tristaniensis | (Dixon) N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Atrichopsis wageri | (Broth. ex Dixon) van Rooy, N.E.Bell & Hyvönen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.