Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astrotricha latifolia | Benth. | 226 | documented |
| Astrotricha longifolia | Benth. | 75 | documented |
| Astrotricha floccosa | DC. | 74 | documented |
| Astrotricha ledifolia | DC. | 16 | documented |
| Astrotricha linearis | A.Cunn. ex Benth. | 16 | documented |
| Astrotricha asperifolia | F.Muell. ex Klatt | 15 | documented |
| Astrotricha umbrosa | A.R.Bean | 9 | documented |
| Astrotricha cordata | A.R.Bean | 6 | documented |
| Astrotricha pterocarpa | Benth. | 4 | documented |
| Astrotricha hamptonii | F.Muell. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha biddulphiana | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha brachyandra | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha crassifolia | Blakely | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha glabra | Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha intermedia | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha obovata | Makinson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha obtusifolia | Gand. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha parvifolia | N.A.Wakef. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha pauciflora | A.R.Bean | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astrotricha roddii | Makinson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.