Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astropanax mannii | (Hook.f.) Seem. | 3 | documented |
| Astropanax abyssinicum | (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax barteri | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax evrardii | (Bamps) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax goetzenii | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax humblotianus | (Drake) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax kivuensis | (Bamps) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax monophyllus | (Baker) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax myrianthus | (Baker) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax polysciadius | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax procumbens | (Hemsl.) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax stolzii | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax tessmannii | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax urostachyus | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astropanax volkensii | (Harms) Lowry, G.M.Plunkett, Gostel & Frodin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.