Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asterolasia trymalioides | F.Muell. | 5 | documented |
| Asterolasia pallida | Benth. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia phebalioides | F.Muell. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia asteriscophora | (F.Muell.) Druce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia beckersii | Orme & Duretto | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia buckinghamii | (Blakely) Blakely | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia buxifolia | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia correifolia | (A.Juss.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia drummondii | Paul G.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia elegans | L.McDougall & Porteners | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia exasperata | P.R.Alvarez & Duretto | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia grandiflora | (Hook.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia hexapetala | (A.Juss.) Druce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia hyalina | (Paul G.Wilson) Wege | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia muricata | J.M.Black | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia rivularis | Paul G.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia rupestris | Mole | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia sola | Duretto & P.R.Alvarez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Asterolasia squamuligera | (Hook.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.