Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astartea scoparia | Schauer | 3 | documented |
| Astartea affinis | (Endl.) Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea arbuscula | (R.Br. ex Benth.) Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea aspera | Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea astarteoides | (Benth.) Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea cicatricosa | Rye & Trudgen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea corniculata | Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea decemcostata | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea eobalta | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea fascicularis | (Labill.) A.Cunn. ex DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea glomerulosa | Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea granitica | Rye & Trudgen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea laricifolia | S.Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea leptophylla | Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea middletonii | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea montana | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea muricata | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea onycis | Rye & Trudgen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea pulchella | (A.Cunn. ex DC.) Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea reticulata | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea schaueri | Rye & Trudgen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea transversa | Rye | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Astartea zephyra | Rye & Trudgen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.