Artocarpus

Accepted species 59 Documented here 10 Family Moraceae

Accepted species 59 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. 204 documented
Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg 130 documented
Artocarpus hirsutus Lam. 34 documented
Artocarpus elasticus Reinw. 24 documented
Artocarpus lacucha Roxb. ex Buch.-Ham. 20 documented
Artocarpus treculianus Elmer 11 documented
Artocarpus hypargyreus Hance ex Benth. 9 documented
Artocarpus chama Buch.-Ham. 8 documented
Artocarpus integer (Thunb.) Merr. 5 documented
Artocarpus rigidus Blume 4 documented
Artocarpus camansi Blanco 2 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus nobilis Thwaites 1 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus odoratissimus Blanco 1 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus albobrunneus C.C.Berg 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus altissimus (Miq.) J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus anisophyllus Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus annulatus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus avatifolius Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus blancoi (Elmer) Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus brevipedunculatus (F.M.Jarrett) C.C.Berg 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus corneri Kochummen 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus excelsus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus fulvicortex F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus glaucus Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus gomezianus Wall. ex Trécul 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus gongshanensis S.K.Wu ex C.Y.Wu & S.S.Chang 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus hispidus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus horridus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus jarrettiae Kochummen 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus kemando Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus lanceifolius Roxb. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus longifolius Becc. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus lowii King 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus mariannensis Trécul 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus multifidus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus nanchuanensis S.S.Chang, S.C.Tan & Z.Y.Liu 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus nigrifolius C.Y.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus nitidus Trécul 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus obtusus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus palembanicus Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus petelotii Gagnep. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus pinnatisectus Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus pithecogallus C.Y.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus primackii Kochummen 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus reticulatus Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus rigida Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus rubrovenia Warb. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus sarawakensis F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus scortechinii King 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus sepicanus Diels 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus sericicarpus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus styracifolius Pierre 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus subrotundifolius Elmer 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus tamaran Becc. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus teysmannii Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus thailandicus C.C.Berg 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus tomentosulus F.M.Jarrett 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus tonkinensis A.Chev. 0 below the evidence gate
Artocarpus vriesianus Miq. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.