Arthraxon

Accepted species 24 Documented here 5 Family Poaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Arthraxon hispidus (Thunb.) Makino 219 documented
Arthraxon lanceolatus (Roxb.) Hochst. 9 documented
Arthraxon lancifolius (Trin.) Hochst. 8 documented
Arthraxon nudus (Steud.) Hochst. 5 documented
Arthraxon jubatus Hack. 3 documented
Arthraxon antsirabensis A.Camus 2 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon australiensis (B.K.Simon) E.J.Thomps. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon castratus (Griff.) V.Naray. ex Bor 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon cuspidatus (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Hochst. ex Hack. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon depressus Stapf ex C.E.C.Fisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon echinatus (Nees) Hochst. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon epectinatus B.S.Sun & H.Peng 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon inermis Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon junnarensis S.K.Jain & Hemadri 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon meeboldii Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon microphyllus (Trin.) Hochst. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon multinervus S.L.Chen & Y.X.Jin 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon nudum Benth. ex C.B.Clarke 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon prionodes (Steud.) Dandy 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon raizadae S.K.Jain, Hemadri & Deshp. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon santapaui Bor 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon submuticus (Nees ex Steud.) Hochst. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon typicus (Buse) Koord. 0 below the evidence gate
Arthraxon villosus C.E.C.Fisch. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.