Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argythamnia argentea | Millsp. | 386 | documented |
| Argythamnia acutangula | Croizat | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia argyraea | Cory | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia candicans | Sw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia coatepensis | (Brandegee) Croizat | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia cubensis | Britton & P.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia ecdyomena | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia haplostigma | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia heteropilosa | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia ingramii | Ram.-Amezcua & V.W.Steinm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia lottiae | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia lucayana | Millsp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia lundellii | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia microphylla | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia moorei | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia oblongifolia | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia proctorii | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia sericea | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia silviae | Ram.-Amezcua & V.W.Steinm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia sitiens | (Brandegee) J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia stahlii | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia tinctoria | Millsp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Argythamnia wheeleri | J.W.Ingram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.