Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arenga engleri | Becc. | 191 | documented |
| Arenga wightii | Griff. | 14 | documented |
| Arenga pinnata | (Wurmb) Merr. | 11 | documented |
| Arenga ryukyuensis | A.J.Hend. | 8 | documented |
| Arenga westerhoutii | Griff. | 5 | documented |
| Arenga australasica | (H.Wendl. & Drude) S.T.Blake ex H.E.Moore | 4 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga brevipes | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga caudata | (Lour.) H.E.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga distincta | Mogea | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga hastata | (Becc.) Whitmore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga hookeriana | (Becc.) Whitmore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga listeri | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga longicarpa | C.F.Wei | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga longipes | Mogea | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga micrantha | C.F.Wei | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga mindorensis | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga obtusifolia | Mart. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga plicata | Mogea | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga porphyrocarpa | (Blume ex Mart.) H.E.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga retroflorescens | H.E.Moore & Meijer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga ryukyuense | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga talamauensis | Mogea | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga tremula | (Blanco) Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Arenga undulatifolia | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.