Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archilejeunea badia | (Spruce) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea bilabiata | (Mitt.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea bongardii | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea crispistipula | (Spruce) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea eberhardtii | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea gradsteinii | X.Q.Shi & R.L.Zhu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea incrassata | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea juliformis | (Nees) Gradst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea ludoviciana | (De Not. ex Lehm.) P.Geissler & Gradst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea nebeliana | Gradst. & Schäf.-Verw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea negrensis | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Archilejeunea ovata | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.