Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aragoa cupressina | Kunth | 19 | documented |
| Aragoa abietina | Kunth | 11 | documented |
| Aragoa occidentalis | Pennell | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa × chingacensis | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa × diazii | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa × funzana | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa × jaramilloi | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa abscondita | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa castroviejoi | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa cleefii | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa corrugatifolia | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa cundinamarcensis | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa dugandii | Romero | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa funckii | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa hammenii | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa kogiorum | Romero | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa lucidula | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa lycopodioides | Benth. ex Oliver | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa parviflora | Fern.Alonso & Castrov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa perez-arbelaeziana | Romero | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa picachensis | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa romeroi | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aragoa tamana | Fern.Alonso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.