Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquilaria sinensis | (Lour.) Spreng. | 17 | documented |
| Aquilaria apiculata | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria baillonii | Pierre ex Lecomte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria banaense | P.H.Hô | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria banaensis | P.H.Hô | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria beccariana | Tiegh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria brachyantha | (Merr.) Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria citrinicarpa | (Elmer) Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria crassna | Pierre ex Lecomte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria cumingiana | (Decne.) Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria decemcostata | Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria filaria | (Oken) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria hirta | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria khasiana | Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria malaccensis | Lam. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria microcarpa | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria parvifolia | (Quisumb.) Ding Hou | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria rostrata | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria rugosa | K.Le-Cong & Kessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria subintegra | Ding Hou | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria urdanetensis | (Elmer) Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aquilaria yunnanensis | S.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.