Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apochloa animara | (Renvoize) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa bahiensis | (Renvoize) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa chnoodes | (Trin.) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa cipoensis | (Renvoize & Send.) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa eligulata | (N.E.Br.) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa euprepes | (Renvoize) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa jauana | (Davidse) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa lorea | (Trin.) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa lutzii | (Swallen) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa molinioides | (Trin.) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa poliophylla | (Renvoize & Zuloaga) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa sipapoensis | (Swallen) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa steyermarkii | (Swallen) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa subtiramulosa | (Renvoize & Zuloaga) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Apochloa tijucae | (Renvoize) Zuloaga & Morrone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.