Aphyllorchis

Accepted species 21 Documented here 0 Family Orchidaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Aphyllorchis acuminata J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis alpina King & Pantl. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis angustipetala J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis anomala Dockrill 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis caudata Rolfe ex Downie 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis evrardii Gagnep. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis exilis Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis halconensis Ames 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis kemulensis J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis maliauensis Suetsugu, Suleiman & Tsukaya 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis montana Rchb.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis pallida Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis periactinantha A.Chantanaorr. & Chantanaorr. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis queenslandica Dockrill 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis siantanensis J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis simplex Tang & F.T.Wang 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis spiculaea Rchb.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis striata (Ridl.) Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis striata Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis sumatrana J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Aphyllorchis yachangensis Ying Qin & Yan Liu 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.