Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anoda cristata | (L.) Schltdl. | 252 | documented |
| Anoda lanceolata | Hook. & Arn. | 17 | documented |
| Anoda acerifolia | Cav. | 15 | documented |
| Anoda pentaschista | A.Gray | 11 | documented |
| Anoda crenatiflora | Ortega | 9 | documented |
| Anoda leonensis | Fryxell | 5 | documented |
| Anoda palmata | Fryxell | 5 | documented |
| Anoda albiflora | Fryxell | 3 | documented |
| Anoda abutiloides | A.Gray | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda maculata | Fryxell | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda guatemalensis | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda henricksonii | M.C.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda hintoniorum | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda hirta | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda paniculata | Hochr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda pedunculosa | Hochr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda polygyna | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda pristina | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda pubescens | Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda reflexa | Díaz-Contreras & Cruz Durán | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda reticulata | S.Watson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda speciosa | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda succulenta | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anoda thurberi | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.