Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annesorhiza macrocarpa | Eckl. & Zeyh. | 47 | documented |
| Annesorhiza nuda | (Ait.) B.L.Burtt | 25 | documented |
| Annesorhiza altiscapa | Schltr. ex H.Wolff | 19 | documented |
| Annesorhiza grandiflora | (Thunb.) M.Hiroe | 5 | documented |
| Annesorhiza wilmsii | H.Wolff | 3 | documented |
| Annesorhiza articulata | Magee | 4 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza bracteosa | Magee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza burttii | B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza calcicola | Magee & J.C.Manning | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza elsiae | Vessio, Tilney & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza fibrosa | B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza filicaulis | Eckl. & Zeyh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza flagellifolia | Burtt Davy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza lateriflora | (Eckl. & Zeyh.) B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza laticostata | Magee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza latifolia | Adamson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza radiata | Magee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza refracta | Magee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza schlechteri | H.Wolff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza thunbergii | B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Annesorhiza triternata | (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Vessio, Tilney & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.