Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anguloa dubia | Rchb.f. | 5 | documented |
| Anguloa virginalis | Linden ex Bosse | 3 | documented |
| Anguloa × acostae | Oakeley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa brevilabris | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa cliftonii | J.G.Fowler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa cliftonii | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa clowesii | Lindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa eburnea | Linden ex B.S.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa hohenlohii | C.Morren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa rolfei | Sander ex Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa ruckeri | Lindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa speciosa | Linden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa tognettiae | Oakeley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anguloa uniflora | Ruiz & Pav. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.