Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angianthus preissianus | (Steetz) Benth. | 7 | documented |
| Angianthus tomentosus | J.C.Wendl. | 7 | documented |
| Angianthus acrohyalinus | Morrison | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus axiliflorus | Ewart & Jean White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus brachypappus | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus conocephalus | (J.M.Black) P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus cornutus | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus cunninghamii | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus cyathifer | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus drummondii | (Turcz.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus glabratus | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus halophilus | Keighery | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus microcephalus | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus micropodioides | (Benth.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus milnei | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus newbeyi | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus phyllocalymmeus | (F.Muell.) Druce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus platycephalus | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus prostratus | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus pygmaeus | (A.Gray) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Angianthus uniflorus | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.