Andrewsianthus

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Lophoziaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Andrewsianthus aberrans (Nees & Mont.) Grolle 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus australis J.J.Engel 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus bidens (Mitt. ex Steph.) R.M.Schust. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus bilobus (Mitt.) Grolle 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus carinatus Grolle 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus cavifolius Grolle & Váňa 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus chimbuensis R.M.Schust. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus hodgsoniae (R.M.Schust.) R.M.Schust. ex J.J.Engel 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus kinabaluensis N.Kitag. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus koponenii Váňa & Piippo 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus marionensis (S.W.Arnell) Grolle 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus mizutanii N.Kitag. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus papillosus N.Kitag. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus perigonialis (Hook.f. & Taylor) R.M.Schust. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus puniceus (Nees) R.M.Schust. ex Grolle 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus recurvifolius (Nees) R.M.Schust. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus scabrellus (C.Massal.) R.M.Schust. ex J.J.Engel 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus sphenoloboides (R.M.Schust.) R.M.Schust. ex J.J.Engel 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus sundaicus (Schiffn.) R.M.Schust. 0 below the evidence gate
Andrewsianthus zantenii Váňa 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.