Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrachne telephioides | L. | 39 | documented |
| Andrachne microphylla | (Lam.) Baill. | 4 | documented |
| Andrachne afghanica | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne aspera | Spreng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne brittonii | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne buschiana | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne ephemera | M.G.Gilbert | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne fedtschenkoi | Kossinsky | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne filiformis | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne fragilis | M.G.Gilbert & Thulin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne fruticulosa | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne maroccana | Ball | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne merxmuelleri | Rech.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne minutifolia | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne pulvinata | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne pusilla | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne pygmaea | Kossinsky | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne ramosa | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne reflexa | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne schweinfurthii | (Balf.f.) Radcl.-Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Andrachne stenophylla | Kossinsky | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.