Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anastrophyllum alpinum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum assimile | (Mitt.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum astorgae | Mamontov & Vilnet | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum auritum | (Lehm.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum ciliatum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum divergens | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum donnianum | (Hook.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum ellipticum | Inoue | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum esenbeckii | (Mont.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum fissum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum joergensenii | Schiffn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum michauxii | (F.Weber) H.Buch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum nigrescens | (Mitt.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum obtusum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum piligerum | (Nees) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum squarrosum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum stellatum | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Anastrophyllum tubulosum | (Nees) Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.