Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amphitecna latifolia | (Mill.) A.H.Gentry | 25 | documented |
| Amphitecna apiculata | A.H.Gentry | 10 | documented |
| Amphitecna tuxtlensis | A.H.Gentry | 8 | documented |
| Amphitecna isthmica | (A.H.Gentry) A.H.Gentry | 3 | documented |
| Amphitecna breedlovei | A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna costata | A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna donnell-smithii | (Sprague) L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna fonceti | Ortíz-Rodr. & Gómez-Domínguez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna gentryi | W.C.Burger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna kennedyi | (A.H.Gentry) A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna loreae | Ortíz-Rodr. & Burelo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna lundellii | A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna macrophylla | (Seem.) Miers ex Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna molinae | L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna montana | L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna parviflora | A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna regalis | (Linden) A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna sessilifolia | (Donn.Sm.) L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna silvicola | L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna spathicalyx | (A.H.Gentry) A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Amphitecna steyermarkii | (A.H.Gentry) A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.