Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alseis blackiana | Hemsl. | 3 | documented |
| Alseis costaricensis | C.M.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis eggersii | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis floribunda | Schott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis gardneri | Wernham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis hondurensis | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis involuta | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis labatioides | H.Karst. ex K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis latifolia | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis longifolia | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis lugonis | L.Andersson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis microcarpa | Standl. & Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis mutisii | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis peruviana | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis pickelii | Pilg. & Schmale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis reticulata | Pilg. & Schmale | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis sertaneja | L.Marinho & J.G.Jardim | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis smithii | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Alseis yucatanensis | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.