Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albertisia apiculata | (Troupin) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia capituliflora | (Diels) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia cordifolia | (Mangenot & Miege) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia crassa | Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia cuneata | (Keay) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia delagoensis | (N.E.Br.) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia exelliana | (Troupin) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia ferruginea | (Diels) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia glabra | (Diels ex Troupin) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia laurifolia | Yamam. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia mangenotii | (Guillaumet & Debray) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia mecistophylla | (Miers) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia megacarpa | Diels ex Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia papuana | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia porcata | Breteler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia puberula | Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia scandens | (Mangenot & Miege) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia triplinervis | Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia undulata | (Hiern) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Albertisia villosa | (Exell) Forman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.