Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agastache urticifolia | (Benth.) Kuntze | 334 | documented |
| Agastache foeniculum | (Pursh) Kuntze | 237 | documented |
| Agastache nepetoides | (L.) Kuntze | 208 | documented |
| Agastache scrophulariifolia | (Willd.) Kuntze | 140 | documented |
| Agastache pallidiflora | (A.Heller) Rydb. | 37 | documented |
| Agastache pallida | (Lindl.) Cory | 12 | documented |
| Agastache parvifolia | Eastw. | 11 | documented |
| Agastache rugosa | (Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Kuntze | 9 | documented |
| Agastache mexicana | (Kunth) Lint & Epling | 8 | documented |
| Agastache breviflora | (A.Gray) Epling | 6 | documented |
| Agastache micrantha | (A.Gray) Wooton & Standl. | 3 | documented |
| Agastache rupestris | (Greene) Standl. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache cana | (Hook.) Wooton & Standl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache palmeri | (B.L.Rob.) Standl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache aurantiaca | (A.Gray) Lint & Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache coccinea | (Greene) Lint & Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache cusickii | (Greenm.) A.Heller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache eplingiana | R.W.Sanders | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache mearnsii | Wooton & Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache occidentalis | (Piper) A.Heller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache pringlei | (Briq.) Lint & Epling | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Agastache wrightii | (Greenm.) Wooton & Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.