Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Afrosciadium magalismontanum | (Sond.) P.J.D.Winter | 62 | documented |
| Afrosciadium platycarpum | (Sond.) P.J.D.Winter | 14 | documented |
| Afrosciadium afrum | (Meisn.) P.J.D.Winter | 7 | documented |
| Afrosciadium abyssinicum | (Vatke) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium articulatum | (C.C.Towns.) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium dispersum | (C.C.Towns.) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium englerianum | (H.Wolff) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium eylesii | (C.Norman) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium friesiorum | (H.Wolff) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium gossweileri | (C.Norman) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium harmsianum | (H.Wolff) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium kerstenii | (Engl.) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium lundense | (Cannon) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium lynesii | (C.Norman) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium natalense | (Sond.) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium nyassicum | (H.Wolff) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium rhodesicum | (Cannon) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Afrosciadium trisectum | (C.C.Towns.) P.J.D.Winter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.