Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aequatorium albiflorum | (Wedd.) Cuatrec. & S.Díaz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium asterotrichum | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium cajamarcense | H.Rob. & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium caucanum | S.Díaz & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium jamesonii | (S.F.Blake) C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium juninense | H.Rob. & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium latibracteolatum | S.Díaz & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium lepidotum | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium limonense | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium palealbum | S.Díaz & A.Correa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium pascoense | H.Beltrán & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium polygonoides | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium repandiforme | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium sinuatifolium | S.Díaz & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium stellatopilosum | (Greenm. & Cuatrec.) C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium tatamanum | S.Díaz & A.Correa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium tovarii | H.Rob. & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium venezuelanum | V.M.Badillo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Aequatorium verrucosum | (Wedd.) S.Díaz & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.