Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adenocarpus complicatus | (L.) J.Gay | 77 | documented |
| Adenocarpus viscosus | (Willd.) Webb & Berthel. | 55 | documented |
| Adenocarpus foliolosus | (Aiton) DC. | 45 | documented |
| Adenocarpus decorticans | Boiss. | 16 | documented |
| Adenocarpus hispanicus | (Lam.) DC. | 12 | documented |
| Adenocarpus telonensis | (Loisel.) DC. | 4 | documented |
| Adenocarpus argyrophyllus | (Rivas Goday) Rivas Mart. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus × subdecorticans | Humbert & Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus anagyrifolius | Coss. & Balansa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus artemisiifolius | Jahand., Maire & Weiller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus bacquei | Batt. & Pit. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus boudyi | Batt. & Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus cincinnatus | (Ball) Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus commutatus | Guss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus desertorum | Castrov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus faurei | Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus mannii | (Hook.f.) Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus ombriosus | Ceballos & Ortuño | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus ronaldii | Essokne & Jury | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Adenocarpus umbellatus | Coss. & Durieu ex Batt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.