Acroceras

Accepted species 24 Documented here 1 Family Poaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Acroceras boivinii (Mez) A.Camus 5 documented
Acroceras calcicola A.Camus 2 below the evidence gate
Acroceras amplectens Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras attenuatum Renvoize 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras bosseri A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras chaseae Zuloaga & Morrone 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras diffusum L.C.Chia 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras elegans A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras excavatum (Henrard) Zuloaga & Morrone 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras fluminense (Hack.) Zuloaga & Morrone 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras gabunense (Hack.) Clayton 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras hubbardii (A.Camus) Clayton 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras ivohibense A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras lateriticum A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras macrum Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras mandrarense A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras manongarivense A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras munroanum (Balansa) Henrard 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras parvulum A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras sambiranense A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras seyrigii A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras tenuicaule A.Camus 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras tonkinense (Balansa) C.E.Hubb. ex Bor 0 below the evidence gate
Acroceras zizanioides (Kunth) Dandy 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.