Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acidodontium exaltatum | (Spruce ex Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium heteroneuron | (Spruce ex Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium indicum | Vineesha, Sajitha, Manju & J.R.Spence | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium integrifolium | Broth. & Thér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium lanceolatifolium | Ochi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium lonchotrachylon | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium longifolium | (Schimp. ex Paris) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium megalocarpum | (Hook.) Renauld & Cardot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium pallidum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium ramicola | (Spruce ex Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium rhamphostegium | (Hampe) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium seminerve | Hook. & Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium sprucei | (Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium subrotundum | (Taylor) Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Acidodontium trachyticola | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.