Acaulimalva

Accepted species 21 Documented here 1 Family Malvaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Acaulimalva nubigena (Walp) Krapov. 9 documented
Acaulimalva alismatifolia (K.Schum. & Hieron.) Krapov. 2 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva acaulis (Cav.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva betonicifolia (A.W.Hill) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva crenata (A.W.Hill) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva dryadifolia (Solms) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva engleriana (Ulbr.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva glandulifera Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva hillii Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva oriastrum (Wedd.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva parnassiifolia (Hook.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva pazensis Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva purdiei (A.Gray) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva purpurea (A.W.Hill) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva rauhii (Hochr.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva rhizantha (A.Gray) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva richii (A.Gray) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva steinbachii Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva stuebelii (Hieron.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva sulphurea Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate
Acaulimalva weberbaueri (Ulbr.) Krapov. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.