Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abacopteris aspera | (C.Presl) Ching | 4 | documented |
| Abacopteris afra | (Christ) comb. ined. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris birii | (R.D.Dixit & Balkr.) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris gardneri | (Holttum) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris gracilis | (Ching ex Y.X.Lin) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris gymnopteridifrons | (Hayata) Ching | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris hirtisora | (C.Chr.) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris macrophylla | (Ching ex Y.X.Lin) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris nitida | (Holttum) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. ex Kovalchuk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris nudata | (Roxb.) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris peltochlamys | (C.Chr.) Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris repanda | (Fée) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris setosa | (Y.X.Lin) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Abacopteris yunguiensis | (Ching ex Y.X.Lin) S.E.Fawc. & A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.